Table of Contents


Views and Mechanics
Publisher's Note
Editor's Note
Review of Language and Mind
Review of This Is My Best
Review of Lost in the Void
Crossword
(Solution Posted in September. Printable version in pdf format of journal.)
May/Jun Crossword Solution
Creative Nonfiction
Puttin' on My Pearls
By Cathryn Braswell
My Dinner with Gacy
By Andy Martello
Mysteries of the Shenandoah Valley
By Casey Clabough
Getting Lucky
By Dale Purvis
Poetry
Your Mind and You Are Our Sargasso Sea
By Lita Sorensen
Midsummer
By Lita Sorensen
Windows
By Lita Sorensen
Simple Man
By B.K. Birch
The View from Here
By Mary Hudock
The Dinner Party
By Ruth Mark
Fiction
It's in the Stars
By Linda Gallant Potts
An Intimate Evening with Papa
By Lance Garrison Ballard
The Prank
By Terri L. Knight
A Pocketful of Starflakes
By Leslie Wolter
Cover Art
Photography by Seth Brown
About the Contributors

© 2006, River Walk Journal and respective authors and artists. All rights reserved. Do not use or reproduce without permission.

River Walk Journal, Inc.
Board of Directors

Chairman - Elizabeth Ross
Vice Chairman - Joseph Koch
Secretary/Treasurer - Geri Stock-Ross
Editorial Director - Patti Kurtz, DA
Literacy Director - Bill Mausteller
Policy Director - PA State Rep. Jess Stairs
Advisory Board
Chairman - Patti Kurtz, DA
Asst. Chairman - Dan Lachenman, PhD
Samuel Hazo
Christopher Leland
Edwin Yoder
Joseph Bathanti
Journal Staff
Publisher - Elizabeth Ross
Editor-In-Chief - Joseph Koch
Sen. Fiction Editor - Patti Kurtz
Sen. Poetry Editor - Neeldhara Misra
Sen. Creative Nonfiction Editor - Brenda Coxe
Contributing Editor - Robert Dittman
Publicity Director (PA) - Geri Stock-Ross

For information about submissions, visit http://www.riverwalkjournal.org/submission.html.

Questions about promotions, subscribers' services, and advertising should be sent to publisher@riverwalkjournal.org.

River Walk Journal, Inc. is a non-profit corporation run entirely by volunteers. For information about volunteer opportunities and internships, visit http://www.volunteermatch.org/results/org_detail.jsp?orgid=58479.

Review of Language and Mind
By Noam Chomsky


Noam Chomsky remains firm on his convictions about the origins of language and study of linguistics in his long-awaited addition to Language and Mind. The theories offered in the first six chapters of this edition have been the target of criticism from within and beyond the linguistics community – from dissent over Chomsky’s neo-Cartesian leanings, to philosophical disagreement over the role of rule following in human cognition.

Chomsky’s final chapter – the new material added in this edition - takes a dim view of current linguistics research, raising questions, which remain unanswered. “Biolinguistics and the human capacity” is first a thumbnail history of sorts for interdisciplinary study of linguistics during the past 50 years, drawing quotes and theories from philosophers, biologists and paleontologists. Then he points out the limitations of study under the format framework, and the futility of basing semantics on either a “word-object” or “symbol-sound” relation – the first being limited by the means to construct an all-inclusive system for objects, the second being limited by aberrations in pronunciation rules as illustrated in earlier chapters.

In studying Universal Grammar, Chomsky suggests that the “Principles and Parameters” framework will overcome limitations of the format framework of the past. Further, he suggests the infinite nature of language - “Merge” permits the construction of new objects from objects that were already constructed. The role of evolution in the development of language is a constant concern to Chomsky, although it raises more questions than answers.

Language and Mind, 3rd Ed. will undoubtedly remain on required reading lists for students of linguistics, and rightly so. It can be said that good academic texts raise as many (if not more) questions than answers, as the goal is to encourage thought and investigation. Noam Chomsky’s work encourages both his followers and his opponents to look deeper into the origins of language – by offering guidance for potential routes of research and theories to refute.